Having a run-off vote between top two finishers who face-off for supporters instills more faith in the outcome than computer-run results.
A:
Option 1: Question the desire to move towards a system that they know has fewer participants and is more expensive. Example: Runoff elections are notoriously expensive and never have as many people in the election. Most voters actively hate when they happen and usually don’t feel like turning out a second time to vote, why do you want a system that we know everyone hates?
Option 2: Bring up that it’s possible to count the votes by hand, thus nullifying the fear of computers or automation.
Was this helpful?
Showing 1 reaction
Sign in with